Pakistan: walking a tightrope

Pakistani demonstrators shout slogans during a rally against a U.S. consular employee, suspected in a shooting, in Lahore on Sunday, Feb. 6, 2011. Photo: AP
·

While there is immense pressure on Pakistan from the U.S. on the Raymond Davis issue, there is also the clear danger of a street backlash from within.


RAYMOND DAVIS: A SLIPPERY COURT OF CHOICE

·

by Anita Joshua

·

Very little in the case of the American employee of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Pakistan, arrested after the killing of two locals in “self-defence” in a crowded intersection of Lahore on January 27, rings true. The only cold facts are the bodies that have been piling up.

First, there were the bodies of the two men that the American — whose name is yet to be confirmed but referred to in the media as Raymond Davis — admits to have gunned down. Then there is the third man run over by a speeding U.S. embassy vehicle that was rushing to Davis’ help. And, now — 10 days later — the wife of one of the two men killed by Davis commits suicide; apparently in protest against the ‘VIP’ treatment being given to him and fearing that he would be allowed to go free by a pliant government.

Much else in this case, which has whipped up rampant anti-American sentiments and hogged the headlines since January 27, remains in the realm of speculation, fed primarily by the refusal of both governments to clear the air on who the American is and what he was doing in Pakistan. While the Pakistan government has maintained a studied silence — except for the Interior Minister stating that Davis has a diplomatic passport and the general insistence that the courts would decide the matter — the U.S. is yet to reveal his name even. And, for the first two days after the incident, the U.S. embassy refused to comment on whether he had diplomatic immunity.

Four statements from the U.S. embassy in Islamabad make no mention of his name, and Assistant Secretary of State P.J. Crowley added to the confusion by stating in his Washington briefing, a day after the incident, that the name doing the rounds in the media was incorrect.

Instead of clearing the air, the official statements put out by the mission added grist to the rumour mill. The media did not have to split hair to make their reports. The U.S. embassy was most helpful. First, it called Davis a staff member of the Consulate-General in Lahore. A day later —  when 48 hours had passed — it described him as a “U.S. diplomat” assigned to the U.S. embassy in Islamabad with a diplomatic passport and a Pakistani visa valid till June 2012.

Invoking the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations which allows him diplomatic immunity, the embassy demanded his immediate release and accused the local police and senior authorities of failing to observe their legal obligation to verify his status with either the U.S. Consulate-General in Lahore or the embassy in Islamabad. “Furthermore, the diplomat was formally arrested and remanded in custody, which is a violation of international norms and the Vienna Convention, to which Pakistan is a signatory,” the embassy said.

Without saying anything officially, the Pakistan government let the word out that as per its records, there was no U.S. diplomat by the name Raymond Davis and a person with that name had been issued a visa to work in the U.S. embassy as a technician. This got the Americans to admit a day later that the man was on the embassy’s technical and administrative staff but asserted that such employees are also entitled to criminal immunity under Article 37 of the Vienna Convention.

This is all that has been made available by way of ‘facts;’ the rest is all conjecture — based on calculated leaks and educated guesses — but in a country prone to conspiracy theories and for a nation familiar with the machinations of the U.S. in the past, the speculation becomes plausible. More so when the U.S. is held to blame for the blowback effect that Pakistan is facing by virtue of being an ally in the American global war on terror. As one lawyer who believes Davis ought to be extended diplomatic immunity put it, the question is whether popular opinion should be allowed to decide the fate of the American and, as a consequence, bilateral relations. But then, he rues, “right now ‘popular opinion’ holds the nation hostage.”

While moderate voices say the furore is misplaced given the rising crime graph and the fact that the two men Davis killed were apparently armed — giving the American reason enough to fire in self-defence as white-skinned foreigners do face a security risk in this country — the average Pakistani views the incident as a graphic example of the impunity with which Americans operate in the country. That the Americans have no explanation for Davis carrying a gun — Mr. Crowley sidestepped the question whether American diplomats in Pakistan were allowed to carry weapons — feeds into the Pakistani sentiment and almost instantly the incident was equated with the drone attacks by the Central Intelligence Agency in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas.

Given that U.S. diplomatic cables leaked by the WikiLeaks recently show the Pakistan government speaking in two voices on the drone attacks — protesting for the consumption of the domestic audience while allowing the CIA’s unmanned Predators into Pakistani airspace as per a tacit agreement — the widespread apprehension is that the federal dispensation will allow Davis to get away. The general belief is that he is a private security operative like Blackwater agents who are allowed a free run of the country.

Most Pakistanis are certain that had it been the other way round — a Pakistani diplomat killing two Americans in the U.S. — Washington would have moved heaven and earth to punish him as was the case when Georgian Deputy Ambassador Gueorgui Makharadze killed a girl in a driving accident in 1997. The U.S. got Georgia to waive diplomatic immunity in that case.

The vocal U.S. demands for the release of Davis and the pressure tactics only lend credence to the belief that America will resort to every means to get its man out. When no headway was made through persuasion, the U.S. began tightening the screws at various levels. A visiting congressional delegation conveyed to the Prime Minister that the Armed Services Committee may find it difficult to approve military aid and arms supply to Pakistan if the American official remained in custody. The State Department snapped all communication with the Pakistan embassy in Washington and now the U.S. has apparently put on hold all scheduled bilateral contacts.

The federal government, thus, finds itself forced to walk a tightrope. On the one hand, there is immense pressure from the U.S. — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called up President Asif Ali Zardari over the weekend and also raised the issue with the Chief of the Army Staff, Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference — amid fears of what this one incident could do to the strategic alliance. On the other, there is the clear and present danger of a street backlash if Davis is let off, similar to the street power shown by the ‘religious’ right-wing organisations over amendments to the blasphemy law.

But it is not as if Pakistan is alone in having to do a trapeze act. The U.S. also cannot afford this strain on bilateral ties as Washington has always maintained that Islamabad’s cooperation in going after terrorists who get safe havens on Pakistani soil along the border with Afghanistan is crucial to the restoration of normalcy in Afghanistan. This particularly rough patch in bilateral ties between two countries which have had a history of blow-hot-blow-cold relationship could not have come at a worse time as the U.S. hopes to begin troops withdrawal from Afghanistan in July.

Little wonder then that satirist and radio host Fasi Zaka wrote in The Express Tribune on February 1: “We have begun the most political of tennis matches, the Desi Davis Cup for the prize of Raymond Davis’s freedom or conviction … The court of choice will be clay, slippery for both Pakistan and America.” And, from the way this “match” has proceeded, there is no straight set clincher coming up.

You might also like

1. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 2. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis 3. Senators oppose US gunman`s release 4. Raymond Davis Incident

Source

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the ‘Wonders of Pakistan’. The contents of this article too are the sole responsibility of the author(s). WoP will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this post.

YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF YOUR COMMENT

Wonders of Pakistan supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers as well. Constraints however, apply in case of a violation of WoP Comments Policy. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.

 


Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://wondersofpakistan.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/pakistan-walking-a-tightrope/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

13 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. The longer the Pakistani’s keep DAVIS locked up
    the more he will start talking and revealing
    more than Wilki leaks Assange could possible tell
    the world??? Davis doesn’t look the type who would
    be willingly give up his life for any one

    • Fully agree with you bernie. The guy shot the two Pakistanis whom he says he shot in self defense. But had he only the intention of defense, he could have shot them in the legs to cripple them and thus defend himself; yet he shot them TO KILL and calls this as self defense. The precision with which he shot them, shows that he is a trigger happy individual who is fully trained to meet such situations and quite possibly he apprehended such a situation. Why? Could be that he was on a mission where he knew the risks.

      Just today Lahores police chief has confirmed on basis of forensic evidence that he indeed shot at those persons with a willing mind.

      Whereas matter is in the court, let us wait till the truth comes out on surface. I personally am of the opinion that he be given the full option of defending himself. Any person, be he a Pakistani or be he an American, must have the option to defend him/herself. Let the law decide on the innocence/crime of Raymond Davis also through proper legal proceedings.

      But am only afraid that the mighty arm of Washington might intervene through backdoor machinations and I don’t think the current government in Pakistan has enough muscle to face that mighty arm for that arm not only feeds our political elite but also provides them the props to stay in power, all at the expense of people of Pakistan. [They did this in case of Ayub Khan, Yahya, Ziaul Haq and Pervaiz Musharraf, and now in the shape of Mr. Zardari who is nothing but a US henchman running the state of Pakistan to fight their war on terror, a terror which is not only killing Pakistanis, both civilian and the military ones but also hitting the very roots of Pakistan as a nation and a state].

  2. Root of Pakistan is being hit .
    Let this help emerge a new Pakistan. as we are visualizing in Egypt.

  3. Haroon Raja and Mujtaba Raja all appear to be set in for a revolt .

  4. […] Pakistan: walking a tightrope 2.      Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 3.      The (Very) Strange Case […]

  5. […] Pakistan: walking a tightrope 2.      Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 3.      The (Very) Strange Case […]

  6. […] 2.   Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 3.  Pakistan: walking a tightrope 4.  Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 5.  The (Very) Strange Case of […]

  7. […] 2.  Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 3.   Pakistan: walking a tightrope 4.  Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 5.  The (Very) Strange Case of […]

  8. […] 4. Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 5. Pakistan: walking a tightrope 6. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 7. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis […]

  9. […] 4. Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 5. Pakistan: walking a tightrope 6. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 7. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis 8. […]

  10. […] 10. Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 11. Pakistan: walking a tightrope 12. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 13. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis […]

  11. […] 6. Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 7. Pakistan: walking a tightrope 8. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 9. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis […]

  12. […] 10. Raymond Davis Case: Obama Fires Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Qureshi 11. Pakistan: walking a tightrope 12. Raymond Davis, Murder and Vienna Convention 1961 13. The (Very) Strange Case of Raymond Davis […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: