India Must Free Human Rights Defender Binayak Sen Immediately [2 of 2]

The life sentence given to Dr. Binayak Sen is the maximum punishment for sedition in India. It is the offence against the notorious section 124(a) of the Indian Penal Code. Dr. Sen has illustrious predecessors. The “Father of the Nation,” Mahatma Gandhi was charged and convicted under it by the colonial British government in 1922.
·

THE DOCTOR WHOM THE STATE FEARS

·

by Subhankar Banerjee

·

The OtherIndia.org reports, “While they [Adivasis] are extremely poor, their land is extremely rich, both in terms of minerals and forests. … Development, and the lust for mineral wealth, is destroying the environment and shattering the lives of indigenous tribals.

… These [mining] operations use enormous quantities of water, which is a scarce commodity in Chattisgarh, and also destroys the environment. … In a situation where the state claims rights to the land and the people who live on that land are treated as peripheral to the national economy, a mass base of the Maoists challenging this status quo forms a threat to the state’s plans for heavy industry and profits in this region.”

\So how much mineral is there in Chhattisgarh to create all these commotion? Here are the estimates presented by the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board: 35 billion tonnes of coal; 2.34 billion tonnes of iron ore; 3.58 billion tonnes lime stone; 606 million tonnes of dolomite; 96 million tonnes of bauxite; and 29 million tonnes of cassiterite. Almost all of India’s coal deposit is in Chhattisgarh and two other states. If that’s not enough to lure the profiteers, there is more, Chhattisgarh has diamond, too.

In 2005 the state of Chhattisgarh set up a vigilante army called Salwa Judum to counter the Maoists and forcibly take away lands from the Adivasis. Binayak Sen has to say this about Salwa Judum: “In Chhattisgarh, the PUCL has been in the forefront of exposing the atrocities of the police. … The PUCL has acted as a whistleblower in the matter of exposing the true nature of the Salwa Judum. … an investigation led by the PUCL and involving several other Human Rights organizations revealed that it was in reality a state sponsored and state funded as well as completely unaccountable vigilante force, to which arms were provided by the government. The activities of the Salwa Judum have led to the emptying of more than 600 villages, and the forced displacement of over 60,000 people. Concerns regarding the activities of the Salwa Judum have been expressed by several independent organizations including the National Human Rights Commission.”

This sentiment is shared by Frazer Mascarenhas, principal of St. Xavier’s College in Mumbai in an article published in The Times of India (February 19, 2011): “Dr. Sen exposed how the objective of the State–sponsored Salwa Judum was to uproot the tribal population, so that their villages could be handed over to industrialists for the vulgar profit of a few that we sometimes call ‘development’. That made him the enemy of the local Government.”

On November 29, 2010 as the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP16 opened in Cancún, Mexico, I published a widely circulated essay titled, “Cancún Opens for GREEN Business But REDD Will Destroy Indigenous Forest Cultures.” I wrote about how the Global North—governments, the UN, and powerful fossil fuel and mineral corporations with support from influential environmental NGOs are converging on a plan to take away the last remaining forests from the indigenous communities in the Global South and sell it back to the polluters—all in the name of solving the climate change crisis, that the developed countries created in the first place.

Can we think of Binayak Sen’s work also as a resistance to the global ecological looting taking place right now in front of our collective eyes?

Dr. Sen ended his recent court testimony with these words: “I am being made an example of by the state government of Chhattisgarh as a warning to others not to expose the patent trampling of human rights taking place in the state. Documents have been fabricated by the police and false witnesses introduced in order to falsely implicate me.”

Binayak Sen’s work hasn’t gone unnoticed either by his country or the world. In 2004 he received the Paul Harrison Award for a lifetime of service to the rural poor from his alma mater, the Christian Medical College. In 2007 he received the R.R. Keithan Gold Medal Award by The Indian Academy of Social Sciences (ISSA) for “his outstanding contribution to the advancement of science of Nature–Man–Society and his honest and sincere application for the improvement of quality of life of the poor, the downtrodden and the oppressed people of Chhattisgarh.” In 2008, the Global Health Council in Washington, DC honored him with the Jonathan Mann Award for Global Health and Human Rights, while he was still incarcerated. On a letter dated May 9 2008, twenty–two Nobel laureates from around the world urged that, “Dr. Sen be freed from incarceration on humanitarian grounds to receive his award and to continue his important medical work.” No such permission was granted to him. Dr. Sen is the first south Asian to receive this prestigious award—he sat in his jail cell with the news.

What can we learn from Binayak Sen’s activism? For protests to have any teeth we must also be willing to sacrifice, something. In most cases we’re too polite, either with our words or with our civil disobedience actions—you see, we’re civilized. We join a rally and come back home to a warm meal and a warm bath—nothing is lost but not much is gained either. Those who sacrifice, however, are often punished, but sometimes get rewarded, too.

THE GLOBAL PROTESTS AND OUR DEMAND

Since Binayak Sen was put in jail in 2007 there have been hundreds of rallies across the world demanding his release. The Indian Supreme Court eventually intervened and Dr. Sen was granted bail on May 25 2009, after being in prison for two years. In an op–ed published in Deccan Chronicle journalist Antara Dev Sen wrote (May 28, 2009), “It took two years of sustained shaming to get Dr. Binayak Sen out on bail. The state had been stoutly ignoring the worldwide chorus of appeals and angry protests since the doctor and civil rights activist’s arrest on flimsy charges back in May 2007.”

After a dragged out prosecution, a trial court in Raipur, Chhattisgarh convicted Binayak Sen on December 24, 2010 with a lifetime sentence and charged him with conspiring to commit sedition. Since this devastating news, in the last two months protests took place in: Amherst, Austin, Bangalore, Bhopal, Boston, Chandigarh, Chennai, Dallas, Delhi, Houston, Hyderabad, Indore, Ithaca, Jaipur, Kolkata, London, Los Angeles, Lucknow, Minneapolis, Mumbai, New York, Patna, Pune, Salem, San Francisco, Seattle, Sitapur, Sonebhadra, Vadodara, Vancouver, Varanasi, Washington, and other cities, towns and villages. I’ve put together a small album of photos from these protests that you can see here. The first photo includes Binayak Sen’s mother Anusuya Sen in the center of the frame during a recent rally in Kolkata, the city of my youth.

Group of 40 Nobel laureates have demanded the immediate release of Indian human rights defender Binayaka Sen, sentenced to life imprisonment for supporting communist guerrillas in the east of India


On January 8, 2011 Nobel laureate economist–philosopher Amartya Sen of Harvard University said in New Delhi, “Even if he did pass [on] the letters, it does not seem to be material of which [allegations of] sedition can be made. In his own writings, Binayak Sen has said that violence is not prudential. He was against sedition and I am amazed by the nature of this decision.”

Binayak Sen however, is not the first person to be charged with this maximum punishment. Mahatma Gandhi was also charged with conspiring to commit sedition. Gandhi admitted his charges and said, “… to preach disaffection towards the existing system of government has become almost a passion with me. … The only course open to you … is … either to resign your post or inflict on me the severest penalty.” In 1922 Gandhi was sentenced to six years in prison.

In an interview published on February 14, 2011, Binayak Sen’s wife Dr. Ilina Sen—well–known social activist and feminist scholar, who currently heads the Department of Women’s Studies at the Mahatma Gandhi University in Wardha said, “I have only seen him once, on the 27th. As a convicted prisoner, he has fewer rights, and can have visitors only once in 15 days. I was told that he is in a maximum–security cell. This is a small courtyard with five cells (cages with iron grills like in the older zoos), in which Binayak, Piyush, Sanyal and three others are kept. … I do not know the legality of this but know that this kind of treatment for a prolonged period can drive one to insanity. The jail superintendent refused to discuss prison conditions with us, and said they would be having a meeting to discuss how the enemies of the state were to be kept.”

In January Amartya Sen organized another letter campaign, this time with 39 other Nobel laureates from around the world to demand immediate release of Binayak Sen. I’m sharing with you verbatim parts of their letter published in The Hindu (February 9, 2011):

“Several months after voicing our concern about Dr. Sen’s detention, one of us travelled to Chhattisgarh; met government

officials; consulted Dr. Sen’s family, lawyers, and colleagues; visited his remote clinic to learn more about his selfless work with the Adivasis; and, after a few days and many hours spent waiting in the Raipur prison yard, finally met with Dr. Sen himself in the presence of the prison warden.

We have seen that Dr. Sen is an exceptional, courageous, and selfless colleague, dedicated to helping those in India who are least able to help themselves. Yet his recompense has been two years in prison under difficult conditions, a blatantly unfair trial lasting two years in the so–called ‘Fast Track’ Sessions Court, an unjust conviction of sedition and conspiracy, and condemnation to life imprisonment.

We earnestly hope that our renewed appeal is heard. We know that there are leaders in India who have the power, humanity, patriotism, and decency to speak out against this injustice. We entreat those leaders to act now, to urge Dr. Sen’s immediate release on bail, and insist that this time his appeal is heard without delay under the highest standards of Indian law.”

They ended their letter with these words: “Surely, those who would see the largest democracy in the world survive and thrive can do no less at this crucial time for both Dr. Sen and for the future of justice in India.”

Other prominent activists in India are urging for a major movement to free Binayak Sen. Mahasweta Devi, one of India’s most beloved novelist–activists said during a February 9, 2011 press conference in Kolkata, “the Constitution gives many rights to people, but the state does not uphold them. The result is that people like Binayak Sen, who has been working for the cause of humanity, has to languish in prison on false charges.” She also drew media’s attention to the forest rights of tribals and said, “It is people like Sen who have dedicated their lives towards making people aware of the rights of the tribals.” For those of you who might not know, Mahasweta gave up her most successful career as a novelist to dedicate her life to work on behalf of the Adivasis. She is in her eighties. A few years ago, I visited her with my dad—my parents grew up with Mahasweta and her siblings in Berhampore.

Amartya Sen is hopeful, “He [Binayak Sen] served a great cause and does serve and will serve. I hope this [his sentencing] is just an intermission, like an interval in a film and then the second part will begin.”

Ilina Sen is hopeful, “I try to hope that I will live again with Binayak in my lifetime.”

On Friday March 11, the Supreme Court of India will hear the plea for admission of the petition. If it is admitted, actual bail hearing could begin in mid April.

India must unconditionally release Binayak Sen immediately and put an end to the great suffering that he and his wife have already endured since May 2007. Binayak Sen deserves a Nobel Peace Prize, not lifetime imprisonment as an enemy of India.

Subhankar Banerjee is a photographer, writer, activist, and founder of ClimateStoryTellers.org.

Concluded.

Previous 1, 2

Source, Title image, Image in the middle
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the ‘Wonders of Pakistan’. The contents of this article too are the sole responsibility of the author(s). WoP will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this post.

YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF YOUR COMMENT

Wonders of Pakistan supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers as well. Constraints however, apply in case of a violation of WoP Comments Policy. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.

 

 

8 replies to “India Must Free Human Rights Defender Binayak Sen Immediately [2 of 2]

  1. It is not only Mr Binayak but thosands of people like me are working for the same objectives and we are deadly against the plundering of natural resouces specially from the tribal and forest areas but our approach is democratic and scintific .We hate arm struggle as being instigated by some antinational elements . The charges against Dr. Sen are very grave in nature. He has been punished by the apex court of the country. Nevertheless Mr. Subhanker is doing a nice work as a well wisher of Dr Sen, yet yet the rulings of India’s apex court must be upheld in any case, in anycirumstance. .

  2. As
    Anderson has done.
    Truth will prevail, but it
    is time now for USA to
    wind-up this dirty net-
    work in Pakistan, for the
    sake of better relations
    and mutual
    understanding between
    the two countries.

    USA WILL NOT DIFFERENCIATE BETWEEN GOOD AND DIRTY WORK TILL THERE EXIST SHADOW OF DIRTY MEN in this part of the world.

  3. Dr. Binayak Sen’s incarceration now seems like it’s part of a wider conspiracy of corporations interested in harvesting the rich resources of our forest areas. They want him out of that region for a long while. Unable to repeat what they did to Shankar Guha Niyogi (who was assassinated by local business interests and who had named Binayak as one of his senior political heirs), they have connived to keep him in prison. None of the charges framed against him have been proven, yet he gets a life sentence? He has uncovered ‘fake encounter’ deaths by the Chhatisgarh government and the violence unleashed by the unlawful Salwa Judum – more power to him! However, sedition, violence or conspiring with those that kill innocents are not qualities that anyone can associate with Binayak; not in a hundred years.

    As part of the Medico Friend circle (MFC), of which Binayak has been an active member since the 1970s, we are deeply committed to Binayak’s release with full honours. Life sentences for flimsy and trumped up charges, murders of activists who legitimately asked for information under the Right to Information Act, announcing (and carrying out) death sentences in the name of religion / blasphemy laws: it only reiterates the fact that we have to strengthen democratic and secular interventions for a peaceful and egalitarian South Asia.

    1. Manisha, I appreciate what you write and fully endorse your views in this regard. The concluding paragraph of your comment viz: Life sentences for flimsy and trumped up charges, murders of activists who legitimately ask for information, announcing (and carrying out) death sentences in the name of religion / blasphemy laws only reiterates the fact that we have to strengthen democratic and secular interventions for a peaceful and egalitarian South Asia; needs to be upheld by all who espouse peace and a sanctity for human rights in south Asia.

  4. …… death
    sentences in the name
    of religion / blasphemy
    laws only reiterates the
    fact that we have to
    strengthen democratic
    and secular
    interventions for a
    peaceful and egalitarian
    South Asia; needs to be
    upheld by all who
    espouse peace and a
    sanctity for human
    rights in south Asia.
    Reply

    @ Dr. Nayyar, but above aim can only be realized by elimination of radical Islam from the region. and that is what international community is doing by allowing entry of NATO in the area .

    1. @ Tewari AK,
      The case of Benayak Sen has nothing to do with radical Islam, neither is NATO’s entry into Afghanistan relevant to Dr. Benayak’s release from the Indian prison.

  5. Hey there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew
    where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment form?
    I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having difficulty finding one?
    Thanks a lot!

Leave a comment

close-alt close collapse comment ellipsis expand gallery heart lock menu next pinned previous reply search share star