David Ray Griffin vs. Cass Sunstein – I

My evidence is 101% proof that Jean Sasson’s Saudi Arabian Princess never existed and that Jean Sasson did not have one single sheet of a diary to write the life story of a Princess from, and best of all: “it proves how Jean Sasson got hold of and used Friederike Monika Adsani’s, my manuscript to write her Princess hoax books with.

·

THE POWER OF UNREASON

·

by Nayyar Hashmey

·

It looks like the United Kingdoms version of Cass Sunstein has finally arrived. The publication called The Power of Unreason has been released. It labels conspiracy theories as dangerous thoughts that could lead to violence. In the publication and subsequent BBC propaganda piece, the authors cite the 7/7 and 9/11 attacks as dangerous conspiracy theories. What they fail to mention is that the official stories for these horrendous terrorist attacks are conspiracy theories themselves. The corporate news defies logic and acts as a sort of god, demanding that you do not believe so called theories no matter how much proof is put forward.

***

[Left] Obama’s regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein.  In 2008 Sunstein wrote a paper advocating thought and speech control titled Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. In it, Sunstein recommends a number of bizarre ways in which the government could “ban conspiracy theories.”

Note for WoP readers: In May, 2010 issue of WoP e-magazinee, we brought to you a series of posts by Prof. David Ray Griffin [see references and links at the end of this article]. Griffin is an authority on 9/11. He is Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA where he’s still co-director of the Center for Process Studies.

Prof Griffin has authored and / or edited three dozen books, mainly in his field, but notably and heroically on 9/11 truth, Osama bin Laden, and his newest titled, “Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.” More on it below. But let me tell you first, what I found after having gone through Prof. Griffin’s previous posts.

After the said posts were published on this blog, I received comments from Osama son Omer bin Laden. Omer contested the viewpoint held by Guy Lawson. Since the whole story around Omer bin Laden has apparently been woven by Jean Sasson, I wondered about the truth in the story. First were Professor’s views, based on assertions by the lady who accused Jean Sasson of having plagiarized her original work [which she passed over to her agent Peter Miller and whom the lady [Fredrike Monika Adsani] accuses of having gone back on the agreement she had with him as her publishing agent.

I further received comments also of Fredrike Monika [who has in the meanwhile reverted to her old name Monika Pavlik] whereby she again repeated her stance on story around bin Laden’s son.

Having two opposite viewpoints, I was in a fix to decide as to who was right and who was wrong. So I got hold of one of Sasson’s books and was utterly disappointed from the literary as well as other professional merits of the book.

I then sent a mail to Omer and his former wife (as Omer himself had suggested me to do so) but surprisingly I got a reply that he was out of his office and will respond to me when he is back home. I waited and waited but none came.

And then came the news that his British wife renamed Zaina had a divorce accusing Omer bin Laden of being a neuro- patient. It was further reported that he is possibly under treatment in some hospital.

I can’t say whether Omer bin Laden’s silence was intentional or it was because of his problems, but what I gathered from reading Jean Sasson, made me suspect the version of Sasson, and if Prof Griffin had based some material on what Adsani says and believes, I have no other recourse but to give weight to his assertions.

Here now is what Adsani wrote me later. Though final judgment is not mine as usual I leave it entirely to the readers to decide what they think is right [what is not].

I quote:

“Dear Sir, I thank you for taking interest. To answer your question in the shortest term, I have to point out that at that time I had to stop litigating because after four years, my finances would not allow me to carry on and because the Judge was biased, calling me Foreigner and leaning towards the American defendants which included the very powerful and influential ‘PRINCESS”- book PUBLISHERS who have deep pockets.

The Judge refused me a Jury and blindlings ignored all my meticulously collected hardcore evidence against the defendants which I had gathered together at great financial expense. What the Judge was more interested in was the copyright-law which she even chose to ‘alter’ for the defendant’s benefit.

My evidence is 101% proof that Jean Sasson’s Saudi Arabian Princess never existed and that Jean Sasson did not have one single sheet of a diary to write the life story of a Princess from, and best of all: “it proves how Jean Sasson got hold of and used Friederike Monika Adsani’s, my manuscript to write her Princess hoax books with.

And thank’s to that Judge who let her of the hook, Jean Sasson has since written nothing but one propaganda-hoax-book after another.

The biggest mistake I made was not to have filed my court case here in good old England, but then, how was I to know that ‘dirty politics’ were hiding behind my court case? I have learned since.

Thank you,

Frriederike Monika Adsani

PS: Prof. David Ray Griffin wrote a wonderful article, but this is by far not the end of the story. Soon but not to much later, the whole truth will be out!!

Unquote.

Next : David Ray Griffin vs. Cass Sunstein – II

—

Related Posts:

1. Did Osama bin Laden confess to the 9/11 attacks (in seven parts) 2. Censored by The Huffington Post: “What Really Happened on September 11th?“  (in two parts) 3. Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/1112. Pakistan’s Master Spy Hamid Gul once again on Blogosphere (in three parts)

Source   ::  Title image

YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF YOUR COMMENT

Wonders of Pakistansupports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers as well. Constraints however, apply in case of a violation of WoP Comments Policy.We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.

We at Wonders of Pakistan use copyrighted material the use of which may not have always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” only. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.