Strategy for the South East China Sea: U.S. Bid for Full Spectrum Global Dominance [1 of 6]

In 2001 the world was chocked by a globally televised terror attack of unprecedented proportions and audacity. World wide, a shocked people saw the three towers of the World Trade Center only two of which were actually hit by a plane disintegrate, the Pentagon on fire. World-wide, captive TV audiences saw supposedly hijacked passenger planes crash into buildings, people in their hundreds plummeting to certain death.



by Christopher Black., James Henry Fetzer, Alex Mezyaev, Christof Lehmann


Here is this report from nsnbc. But let me tell you first about this site.

nsnbc is a news-media, established in August 2011. Purpose of the site is to break corporate or state controlled media’s embargo on truth. In pursuance of this objective, nsnbc publishes articles from journalists, authors and experts from all continents.

nsnbc’s founding editor is Dr. Christof Lehmann whose objective to establish the nsnbc is to bring its readers the daily no-spin reporting, in depth analysis and opinion from throughout the world.

Its politically independent, but there is no such thing as economically independent media.

Delivering daily news, maintaining secure telephone lines for whistle blowers and citizen reporters, as well as time spent, that otherwise could have been used on a paying profession are expenses that need to be covered. Therefore, modest, but frequent “Donations” are not only encouraged by site, but considered necessary to secure that nsnbc remains no spin Media.

And now about this report. Courtesy my friend Peter Chamberlin of ‘There are no sunglasses’ weblog. Its content as put up there had minor inconsistencies, so to make the matter readable, I have slightly edited it.

The time I read the whole report, I just said to myself., this is it. So analytical, to the point and eye opening for our policy makers, think tanks and leaders, the politicians as well as the military top brass [which I do not think all of them will read it, because they won’t have time to read such reports, for such matter which mirrors before them the naked truth and truth is something our leaders do not like to read].

And dear readers, while putting up suitable content on WoP site, I have never tagged any post, video or imags as Editor’s Choice, Most Read etc. because I always leave it to you, what stuff you may like or dislike. But this one is the report I would definitely like to tag as “MUST READ”. [Nayyar]



A geo-political analysis of the background for the developments in the South-China Sea region, and suggested developments towards regional security and stability.


Subsequent to the dissolution of the USSR, the peaceful transition of Hong Kong from British to Chinese sovereignty and the subsequent opening of the Chinese market for Western investors, a superficial analysis may lead to the conclusion that the international community has missed the chance to establish a geo-political climate that could have facilitated the peaceful coexistence of sovereign nations.

However, on closer inspection, it is evident that it is a fallacy to speak in terms of a missed chance. The chance for peaceful coexistence between China, the USA, and to a lesser degree the E.U., has in fact never been given a real chance.


It is also a fallacy to conclude that this chance depended on a left/right paradigm in US and Western politics. From neo-conservative think tanks like the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) i, to left or liberal organizations like those funded by the multi-billionaire George Soros, which include Human Rights Watch and the International Crisis Group ii, to global strategists like Zbigniev Brzezinski iii, national security adviser for multiple US-Administrations, whose declared goal is to engage both Russia and subsequently China in a military confrontation iv, the operand question is not whether a left/right paradigm determines the overall direction of US foreign policy but rather how the left/right paradigm manifests in strategic nuances in overall US foreign policy which has a clear propensity towards a Pax Americana and American, global, full spectrum dominance.

The term “Global” is to be taken literally. This policy includes ambitions for a re-colonization of Africa and the Middle East, the destabilization of Latin America, and countering recent developments such as ALBA, UNASUR and MERCOSUR, countering developments within BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization SCO, a presence in Afghanistan until 2025 and beyond, destabilization of Pakistan, the destabilization of Nepal and Burma and an increased military presence in Thailand, Vietnam and throughout the Asian and Pacific region.

It includes the destabilization of Russia´s and China´s southern borders, and an increased military footprint, in those regions and support of destabilizing influences, such as militia and terrorist organizations. v

And it includes the provocation of conflicts in South East Asia and the South East China Sea, an aggressive policy towards Northern Korea and the derailing of attempts towards reunification on the Korean peninsula.

It further includes denying Russia and China access to resources necessary for the development of their economies and their partnership based trade models that are inherently opposed to Western, imperialist capitalism and denying resources and markets to a system that is far more successful, humane, just, fair and sustainable.

The failing of the US/EU economies has required the western military doctrine be adjusted to a return to nuclear confrontation for the containment of unmanageable military responses to NATO expansionism by Russia and China, combined with low cost mercenary warfare with the aid of Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, in fact any militant or terrorist organization that can be utilized in the creation of national and regional crisis which are created to destabilize nations and to justify aggression as “interventions” under pretexts like human rights, security or the the slogan “responsibility to protect”.

These two doctrines, nuclear confrontation and use of mercenaries to attack from within are what one could call the post 25th NATO Summit military doctrine of Western powers and both are in violation of the UN Charter. vi

It is necessary to understand the US/NATO strategy of subversion in South East Asia and how a deterioration of national and regional security due to this subversion could be prevented, and in fact, how peaceful regional solutions to the challenge of US/NATO ambitions for global full spectrum dominance can be established. To understand this strategy it is necessary to undertake a brief review of the developments of recent years in global security.

This analysis will provide a disturbingly clear outline of what is in store for South East Asia and greater Asia unless such a solution is achieved through negotiation and then crafted and implemented.


In 2001 the world was chocked by a globally televised terror attack of unprecedented proportions and audacity. World wide, a shocked people saw the three towers of the World Trade Center only two of which were actually hit by a plane disintegrate, the Pentagon on fire. World-wide, captive TV audiences saw supposedly hijacked passenger planes crash into buildings, people in their hundreds plummeting to certain death.

Sympathy was outpouring from even the most unexpected of places like Palestine. A visibly shocked, shaken, and appalled PLO Secretary General, Yassir Arafat expressed his deepest condolences, sympathy and even solidarity with the nation that had for decades financed the Zionist/Israeli genocide on the people of Palestine.

It took only minutes after the second plane hit the WTC towers, however, before it transpired that something was not quite as advertized. Re-analyzing the TV-coverage archives vii of the day is in deed a revealing odyssey in mass manipulation.

Recycled TV images were aired and it was claimed that “Palestinians were celebrating the successful terror attack on the USA”. A “terrorism expert” declared only minutes after the initial attacks that the most likely suspect would be a “terrorist organization like the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine – DFLP”. viii

Soon the first planted evidence was “discovered”, like a terrorists passport that was found in almost pristine condition in the street after it supposedly had flown out of the hijackers pocket, survived the plane impact, the fireball, and landed in the streets below. ix The Al-Qaeda / Bin Laden narrative was born.

Those who were awake enough from day one, who realized that something was suspect, soon realized that the attacks were the new Peal Harbor, the catastrophic and catalyzing event which one year prior to the attacks had been described in a white paper of the neo-conservative think-tank PNAC, called “Rebuilding Americas Defences”. x

Even though expert analysts differ with respect to whether rogue elements of the international Western deep state let it happen on purpose or if they made it happen on purpose, all serious analysts, including high level politicians, diplomats, members of the intelligence communities and scholars world wide agree that 9/11 was the initiation of the Project for Global, Full Spectrum US/NATO Dominance as described in PNAC´s white paper. (ibid.) xi

There were indeed signs enough from day one, and those who were trained enough in recognizing and analyzing social engineering and propaganda strategies would review the news images – without the sound of the talking heads who repeated the new mantra of global war.


Next: Al Qaeda – Al Qaeda Al – Qaeda – Bin Laden Bin Laden Bin Laden”

Pages  1   2  3   4  5  6

 Source    Title image



Wonders of Pakistan supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers as well. Constraints however, apply in case of a violation of WoP Comments Policy. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.
We at Wonders of Pakistanuse copyrighted material the use of which may not have always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” only. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

One reply to “Strategy for the South East China Sea: U.S. Bid for Full Spectrum Global Dominance [1 of 6]

  1. To the editor of “Wonders of Pakistan”.

    Thank you for your kind words about the article of which I am the principle author, thank you for publishing it and for your kind words about my blogg nsnbc. All of it is very appreciated.

    To your suggestion that the political leadership in Pakistan could read the article. I have received feedback that confirmed that the article has been discussed at the UNSC and at the US Department of State. So why would political leaders in Pakistan not read it. Thank you for helping to facilitate just that.

    I see that Wonders of Pakistan has very good articles about the situation in Pakistan, the region, and geo-political factors contributing to them. It would be very interesting to co-operate.

    If you send me an e-mail to and write WONDERS OF PAKISTAN into the subject line I will get back to you as soon as possible.

    With warm regards.

    Dr. Christof Lehmann

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
close-alt close collapse comment ellipsis expand gallery heart lock menu next pinned previous reply search share star