Why do they hate the West so much, we will ask

And I write the following without the slightest doubt: we’ll hear all these scandalous fabrications again. We’ll have the Hamas-to-blame lie – heaven knows, there is enough to blame them for without adding this crime – and we may well have the bodies-from-the-cemetery lie and we’ll almost certainly have the Hamas-was-in-the-UN-school lie and we will very definitely have the anti-Semitism lie.
·

WHY DO THEY HATE US, WE WILL ASK? BUT LET US NOT SAY WE DO NOT KNOW THE ANSWER. 

·

by Robert Fisk

·

So once again, Israel has opened the gates of hell to the Palestinians. Forty civilian refugees dead in a United Nations school, three more in another. Not bad for a night’s work in Gaza by the army that believes in “purity of arms”. But why should we be surprised?

Have we forgotten the 17,500 dead – almost all civilians, most of them children and women – in Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon; the 1,700 Palestinian civilian dead in the Sabra-Chatila massacre; the 1996 Qana massacre of 106 Lebanese civilian refugees, more than half of them children, at a UN base; the massacre of the Marwahin refugees who were ordered from their homes by the Israelis in 2006 then slaughtered by an Israeli helicopter crew; the 1,000 dead of that same 2006 bombardment and Lebanese invasion, almost all of them civilians?

What is amazing is that so many Western leaders, so many presidents and prime ministers and, I fear, so many editors and journalists, bought the old lie; that Israelis take such great care to avoid civilian casualties. “Israel makes every possible effort to avoid civilian casualties,” yet another Israeli ambassador said only hours before the Gaza massacre. And every president and prime minister who repeated this mendacity as an excuse to avoid a ceasefire has the blood of last night’s butchery on their hands. Had George Bush had the courage to demand an immediate ceasefire 48 hours earlier, those 40 civilians, the old and the women and children, would be alive.

What happened was not just shameful. It was a disgrace. Would war crime be too strong a description? For that is what we would call this atrocity if it had been committed by Hamas. So a war crime, I’m afraid, it was.

After covering so many mass murders by the armies of the Middle East – by Syrian troops, by Iraqi troops, by Iranian troops, by Israeli troops – I suppose cynicism should be my reaction. But Israel claims it is fighting our war against “international terror”.

The Israelis claim they are fighting in Gaza for us, for our Western ideals, for our security, for our safety, by our standards. And so we are also complicit in the savagery now being visited upon Gaza.

I’ve reported the excuses the Israeli army has served up in the past for these outrages. Since they may well be reheated in the coming hours, here are some of them: that the Palestinians killed their own refugees, that the Palestinians dug up bodies from cemeteries and planted them in the ruins, that ultimately the Palestinians are to blame because they supported an armed faction, or because armed Palestinians deliberately used the innocent refugees as cover.

The Sabra and Chatila massacre was committed by Israel’s right-wing Lebanese Phalangist allies while Israeli troops, as Israel’s own commission of inquiry revealed, watched for 48 hours and did nothing. When Israel was blamed, Menachem Begin’s government accused the world of a blood libel.

After Israeli artillery had fired shells into the UN base at Qana in 1996, the Israelis claimed that Hizbollah gunmen were also sheltering in the base. It was a lie. The more than 1,000 dead of 2006 – a war started when Hizbollah captured two Israeli soldiers on the border – were simply dismissed as the responsibility of the Hizbollah. Israel claimed the bodies of children killed in a second Qana massacre may have been taken from a graveyard. It was another lie. The Marwahin massacre was never excused. The people of the village were ordered to flee, obeyed Israeli orders and were then attacked by an Israeli gunship.

The refugees took their children and stood them around the truck in which they were travelling so that Israeli pilots would see they were innocents. Then the Israeli helicopter mowed them down at close range. Only two survived, by playing dead. Israel didn’t even apologise.

Twelve years earlier, another Israeli helicopter attacked an ambulance carrying civilians from a neighbouring village – again after they were ordered to leave by Israel – and killed three children and two women. The Israelis claimed that a Hizbollah fighter was in the ambulance. It was untrue. I covered all these atrocities, I investigated them all, talked to the survivors. So did a number of my colleagues. Our fate, of course, was that most slanderous of libels: we were accused of being anti-Semitic.

And I write the following without the slightest doubt: we’ll hear all these scandalous fabrications again. We’ll have the Hamas-to-blame lie – heaven knows, there is enough to blame them for without adding this crime – and we may well have the bodies-from-the-cemetery lie and we’ll almost certainly have the Hamas-was-in-the-UN-school lie and we will very definitely have the anti-Semitism lie.

And our leaders will huff and puff and remind the world that Hamas originally broke the ceasefire. It didn’t. Israel broke it, first on 4 November when its bombardment killed six Palestinians in Gaza and again on 17 November when another bombardment killed four more Palestinians.

Yes, Israelis deserve security. Twenty Israelis dead in 10 years around Gaza is a grim figure indeed. But 600 Palestinians dead in just over a week, thousands over the years since 1948 – when the Israeli massacre at Deir Yassin helped to kick-start the flight of Palestinians from that part of Palestine that was to become Israel – is on a quite different scale.
This recalls not a normal Middle East bloodletting but an atrocity on the level of the Balkan wars of the 1990s. And of course, when an Arab bestirs himself with unrestrained fury and takes out his incendiary, blind anger on the West, we will say it has nothing to do with us. Why do they hate us, we will ask? But let us not say we do not know the answer.

More from Robert Fisk on Wonders of Pakistan

1. Robert Fisk: ‘They snipe at us then run and hide in sewers’ 2In the end, all Israel and her Western allies want to do is to break Iran via Syria 3. Syrian War Of Lies And Hypocrisy  4. Clinton’s $33m raid on Pakistan shows that, in the end, hypocrisy will win  5. Madness is not the reason for Kandahar massacreacre 6. If this is a US victory, does that mean its forces should go home now? 7. Was OBL betrayed?
Robert Fisk is Middle East correspondent for The Independent newspaper. He is the author of many books on the region, including The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East. © 2012 Independent/UK
Source, Tiitle image, Image next
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the ‘Wonders of Pakistan’. The contents of this article too are the sole responsibility of the author(s). WoP will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this post.

YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT

DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF YOUR COMMENT

We at Wonders of Pakistanuse copyrighted material the use of which may not have always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” only. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://wondersofpakistan.wordpress.com/2012/10/08/why-do-they-hate-the-west-so-much-we-will-ask/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

10 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. As early as the issues related to Israel and Kashmir is not unilaterally solved by the UN through compelling the people who think that they will win it through armed struggle. Force them to accept the decision as they will not be in a position to get it in the next 64 years. The crisis will remain there for a long time to come .

    • IIf you mean a unilateral solution/resolution through United States and her western allies, then such solution is already there (Palestine occupied by Israel since last 64 years)….

    • As regards Kashmir, the UN has not been able to implement its own resolutions. The Indian solution/resolution is not acceptable to the people of Kashmir. So what to do. The only practical way out, is for India, Pakistan and the people of Kashmir to sit around a table and find a permanent solution. War (a military solution) either by India or Pakistan or the Kashmiris themselves is neither practical nor will it bring anything better for all the three parties. So, I WOULD SAY, Talk. If first round of talks fail, have more talks and even if it doesn’t work, have still more talks……Till all the three reach a commonly acceptable solution. [Just like the Vatican, when all cardinals sit together to choose a new Pope. In spite of all the differences in view points, likes and dislikes, biases and prejudices they continue their deliberations till such time smoke starts coming out of Vatican’s top roof, an indication that the New Pope has been selected.]

  2. Once it will be decided at higher international level then those asking for plebicide or willing to wipe out Israeil from the map will morally cool down and no other party will take interest in the issue . Talk is no more a solution and the world can not afford such conflicts any more .

    • Dr. Tewari, are you suggesting the same ‘Final Solution” for Kashmiris and the Palestinians, which Hitler had for the Jews????

  3. Dr. Nayyar , It is all up to you to compare my opinion with any one else but the matter of fact is that Hitler did what he thought best for the well being of his people by pushing or eliminaring those who entered in their land from some where else and started to dominate on local people through their talent . But Israeili are again reoccupying the land of their ancesters once snached from them and forced them to migrate to Europe . We are not doing the same in case of Kashmir but if the Pakistan continued to devide Kashmir on the name of religion then we will feel proud to behave like Hitler to treat all those who will ignore our determination to keep Kashmir as an integral part of India .

    • Why are u afraid to spell out those people, they were the Jews and FYI they did not come from some where else but were the ‘Edelreichen ‘Deutschen Juden’ i.e. the nobility rich Jews.

      Though I do not subscribe to all what the western media says about Holocaust but I only picked the term which western media attributes to Hitler that he wanted to exterminate the German Jews because that was the only and the final sloution to get rid of the “Judenproblem”.

      Whether there is any truth to this final solution theory of Hitler, I’m not in a position to comment, because both in Palestine and Kashmir, the local population feels oppressed against the governments in their respective countries..

      Your comparison of the plight of Palestinians and Kashmiris to the Jews of Germany seems frivolous because Hitler whether was right or wrong, history already is full of what ultimately happened to him. So better not talk about “final solutions”. Let the sanity prevail on both sides of the border, which thankfully appears to be prevailing to some extent now. PEACE NOT WAR, that’s what humanity needs at the moment.

  4. I will again emphasise that experience tell us clearly that talk will not yield the desired result ,it will further delay the process means more bloodshed . The on going war against terrorism should continue so to show them holocoust who doubt that holocoust happened against the innocent jews in the past . Now we can not linger the issue for the next generation . Milliions have already died ,let many more death occure in the next five years but the on going war should culminate only after finding the final solution to these two historical problems .

  5. To borrow the term from Gilad Atzmon (himself a Jew but an upright one).
    Nazionist Fulminations.

  6. See the twisted tongue , of some one who claims to bridge the gap ,

    Blogosphere is above the Biosphere…..?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: