
As the global media were busy harping on “Islamic Terrorism” a new phenomenon emerged in India, the “Saffron Terrorism” a name given to Hindutva extremism by none else than the country’s Home Minister, P Chidambaram. It was to these saffron terrorists that Breivik referred in his 1500-page manifesto giving clear hints about the sources from where he got inspiration. The names included various wings of Sangh Parivar with whom he was in touch through e-mails. No wonder that a Sangh Parivar zealot B P Singhal, while talking to Christian Science Monitor boastfully sympathized with the cause highlighted by the Norwegian killer Anders Behring Breivik. “I am with the shooter in his objective, but not in his method. If you want to attract the nation’s attention, surely you need to do something drastic and dramatic.” Said Singhal.
·
BJP MP: NORWEGIAN KILLER’S IDEAS WERE NOT WRONG
·
by TNN
·
Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik’s ringing endorsement of Hindutva and Hindu nationalists has left saffron leaders embarrassed.
·
Ram Madhav of RSS called it “motivated propaganda”, while VHP’s Vinod Bansal insisted that his manifesto, in which he has praised Hindu nationalists, “made no sense”. However, BJP MP B P Singhal was quoted as saying that the killer’s ideas were not wrong but his methods were.
·
·
In his over 1,500-page manifesto titled “2083: A European Declaration of Independence”, Breivik talks of Hindutva elements as allies and urges them to fight shoulder to shoulder with his knights. His mission: To stem the spread of Islam in Europe. That India occupies a large part of his perverse mindspace is clear from the 100 pages he dedicates to the country. He comes out in support of “sanatana dharma movements and Indian nationalists in general”.
·
·

He provides the BJP, RSS and ABVP websites as references for more information. The Indian government, he claims, should have insisted on a name change of the Hindu Kush mountains in
Afghanistan, because they were named after the Hindus who “were massacred” there. Modern India, he says, “white washed this Hindu genocide”, which he likens to “Auschwitz”.
·
·
Breivik quotes an NCERT directive of 1982 (which actually shows India embracing its multicultural identity) to say he is outraged that it stipulates, “characterization of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Moslems is forbidden”.
·
Reacting to Breivik’s rant, Ram Madhav, senior RSS leader, said: ” His entire so-called manifesto quotes conservative writers from both sides of the Atlantic. Ideological similarities have been drawn from all over, so to say suddenly that it is linked to Indian nationalists or Hindutva is simply motivated propaganda.”
·
The VHP’s Vinod Bansal said: “Most of what he has to say makes no sense, except the bit about appeasing Muslims is right. Basically, the UPA government under Sonia Gandhi has been indulging in it and also framing policies in such a way that the whole country is converted to Christianity.”
·
Hindus, Breivik says, have been victims of the greatest historical “genocide” by waves of Islamic jihad.
·
He quotes right-wing historian KS Lal to argue his point. The most important part of this document is his cherry-picking of history and religion to come to some terribly distorted conclusions.
·
Breivik claims he wrote several emails and also used Facebook to reach out to people in India. It is possible that he sent his manifesto to the addresses he farmed ahead of the massacre.
·
There are several themes running through Breivik’s tortured manifesto. On the one hand, he attacks Islam and the “appeasement” of Muslims by everybody from western countries to countries like India. But on the other, he has a special place for what he calls the Marxist intellectuals, who, he says, dominate western thought and stifle free societies.
—
Related Posts:
1. Obama reaction to Norway massacre betrays US “War on Terror” fundamentalism 2. Anders Breivik wasn’t a “lone wolf”, he was part of a movement 3. Oslo Bomb explosion July 22, 2011 & the succeeding terrorist attack [Video]
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report / article / Op-Ed are the sole responsibility of the author or the source from where this material has been taken. These may not necessarily reflect those of the ‘Wonders of Pakistan’. The contents of this article too are the sole responsibility of the author (s) or the source. WoP will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statement / s contained in this post.
YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF YOUR COMMENT
Wonders of Pakistan supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers as well. Constraints however, apply in case of a violation of WoP Comments Policy. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.
We at Wonders of Pakistan use copyrighted material the use of which may not have always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” only. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
The Demonization of Muslims is “Completely At Odds with America’s Founding Principles”
1. This and the following are disturbing images, because we as Americans know that they falsely depict who we are.But Americans have demonized our enemies as well. For example, in World War II, anti-Japanese posters (such as image 6 below) were used to whip up hatred of the enemy: And, at times, Americans have even demonized other Americans, such as during the Civil War (image 7 below).
·
Δ We Always Demonize Our Enemies to Drum Up Support for War.
Δ War is always sold to it’s people by artificially demonizing the enemy.
Δ Countries need to lie about their enemies in order to demonize them sufficiently so that the people will support the war.
Δ Everyone knows that “truth is the first casualty of war“.
Δ All wars are based on propaganda.
·
DEMONIZING MUSLIMS FOR SUPPORT OF WAR
·
by WashingtonsBlog
·
Preface: I am not a Muslim or some kind of cheerleader for Middle Eastern countries. I was born and raised in America, and come from a Judeo-Christian background. Like the Founding Fathers, I am simply opposed to unnecessary war … and tolerant of other religions.. (more…)
- News, Views & Analysis
- Op-Eds
- Political Essays & Commentaries
on October 12, 2012 at 3:33 pm Leave a CommentTags: Islam, Islam and Christianity, Islam and Millitancy, Islamophobia, US Foreign Policy, War on Terror, Will US Win the War on Terror?